HE IS WOUNDED! NOPE, HE
IS DEAD!
Luke 20: (KJV)
10 “And at
the season he sent a servant to the husbandmen, that they should give him of the
fruit of the vineyard: but the husbandmen beat him, and sent him away empty.
11 And again he sent
another servant: and they beat him also, and entreated him shamefully, and sent
him away empty.
12 And again he sent a third: and they wounded him also, and
cast him out.”
Compare
to
Mark 12: KJV)
2 “And at the season he sent to the husbandmen a
servant, that he might receive from the husbandmen of the fruit of the
vineyard.
3 And they caught him, and beat him, and sent him away empty.
4 And again he sent unto them another servant; and at him they cast
stones, and wounded him in the head, and sent him away shamefully handled.
5 And again he sent another; and him they killed, and many others; beating some, and killing some.”
In “Luke” the third servant is just wounded
while in “Mark”
the third servant is killed.
Luke likely thought she could improve on Mark by
reserving the killing of the servant for the “son” and why shouldn’t she feel free
to change “Mark;” it’s not like it was written by anyone who either knew Jesus
or even someone who knew someone who knew Jesus.
Looks Like Mark got carried
away and created a sadistic blood bath; “… and many others; beating some, and
killing some.”
Copyright ©
2001-2009 1001 Errors in the
Christian Bible
®™ All rights reserved.