MATTHEW’S
ERRORS, DISTORTIONS & MISQUOTATIONS
Hugh Fogelman
Over
twenty times in the gospel of Matthew, the unknown author goes out of his way
to tell of prophecy fulfillment. By doing so, the author of Matthew had to misquote,
misinterpret verses in his favor, take verses out of context, or simply make
them up to reach his goal. Comparing what the author of Matthew wrote to the Old Testament―the Hebrew Bible; we find the
following:
Matthew
1:2―15 – His list of generations does not agree with l Chronicles Ch.
1―3
Matt.
Matt.5:43
– had Jesus say, “thou shalt love thy neighbor and hate thine enemy.” Leviticus
Matt.
Matt.
Matt.
Matt.
3:3 – Misinterprets and alters Isaiah 40:3 – “Prepare the way of the Lord.” Not
so.
Matt.
Matt.
12:17―21 – Taking Isaiah 42:1―4 out of context – the Servant was
Matt.
13.14―15 – Took out of context Isaiah 6:9―10 of people being
“blind”
Matt.
2:5―6 – Misinterprets Micah 5:2 ― the Messiah coming from
Matt.
Matt.
11.10 – By changing the pronoun in Malachi
3.1 “before ME” or “before YOU”?
Matt.
Matt.
21:1―7 – Jesus riding on two donkeys at the same time – good trick
― (Zechariah 9:9)
Matt.
22:43―44 – Capitalizes the second lord – altering the meaning of Psalm
110:1
Matt.
Matt.
27:9 – Quoted the wrong prophet ― was not Jeremiah but Zechariah
Matt.
27:9 – Book of Zechariah was never about any “potter’s field”
Matt
2.12 – Contradicts Luke about going to
Matt
9:9 – Becoming one of the 12 conflicts with Luke and John.
Matt
27:57-66 ― Disagrees with Mark, Luke and John at the “burial scene”
MAKING UP STORIES
Matt
Chapter 2 not verified by any other writer and not logical
Matt
Matt
Matt
Matt
27:51 ― And behold the veil of the temple was rent in twain – event never
happened
Matt
27:52 ― The graves were opened and the dead went to
Matthew 9:9 ―The author wrote in the third person. This was unusual as no
other author wrote that way. Makes one wonder if Matthew himself wrote this
book.
Christiholics should clearly see that the author
of Matthew was not inspired by the
Christian god ― "Invisible Man
in the Sky." Would the Holy Spirit, as Christians claim, make such
gross mistakes ― that is, if the Spirit were guiding the writing of such
a document? Why would the Holy Spirit use such an ignorant man to write a
so-called “inspired” document ― a man who does not even know the only
bible of the time ― the Hebrew bible.
Two
things are known:
(1)
Matthew, IF he was Jewish, knew very little Hebrew and did not understand
the Hebrew Bible, and
(2)
He knew very little about Jewish law, since he relied so much on the Greek
Septuagint.
The
author of Matthew was using the Septuagint 'LXX'―the Greek version of the
Hebrew bible compiled in the 2nd century BCE for the Greek―speaking Jews
of the Diaspora.
The
Jewish Scribes and rabbis only translated the first five books of Moses in the
LXX Septuagint. There is no record who wrote the rest of the Hebrew bible,
presumably they were not Jews. That means that the Greeks translated Isaiah and
the prophets and are responsible for the changing of the word “young woman” in
the Hebrew to “virgin” in the Greek ― a blatant mistranslation.
Mathew
wrote; “…from the blood of righteous Abel unto Zacharias, son of Barachias,
whom you slew between the temple and the altar” (
When
you find one or two events that are clearly not true, you end up having huge
doubts as to overall reliability of this book. When you find over 20 events
that are not true, altered, questionable
(based upon no facts or distorted facts) or contradicts other writers,
the whole book ends up being fiction or questionable as to just how truthful is
it. Likewise one will find similar untruths and distortions in the Hebrew bible
(Old Testament) ― 6-day universe creation; walking talking snake; giant
fish tale; stick turning to a snake; slavery verified; misogyny, bigotry and
much more. That book should also regarded as fiction!
Did
a god inspire Matthew? NO! Is there an "Invisible
Man in the Sky?" NO! God is imaginary!
"I used to believe in God,
until I reached the age of reason." -George Carlin (1937-2008)
DISCLAIMER:
Citation of Hebrew scripture and
sources in articles or analyses is not in any way an acceptance, approval or
validation of the Jewish religion, its works or scriptures. The Hebrew bible,
like the Christian New Testament, is fictitious; From a 6―day creation of the
universe; a cunning, walking, talking snake; big fish tales; world flood and an
"Invisible Man in the Sky" ― it is all fiction, a bold sham
perpetrated on mankind.